Tumblelog by Soup.io
Newer posts are loading.
You are at the newest post.
Click here to check if anything new just came in.

June 16 2011

07:13

"Flash Mob on South Street" - video games or how to connect kids with news

Niemanlab ::  "Flash Mob on South Street" : Students ranging in age from 9 to 11 years old spent time learning more about these flash mobs, and with the help of their teacher, John Landis, they created video games to tell this story in a way and through a medium that kids can relate to. Youngsters made video games, and educators found that "hands-on activity helped kids to process news reporting. It also gave them ways to tell this story by integrating their perspectives as they aimed it at fresh audiences."

How to connect kids with news - continue to read Renee Hobbs, www.nieman.harvard.edu

November 17 2010

07:25

A mob is just a crowd you’re not part of

Mobs have been very much back in the spotlight over the past couple of weeks. The Cooks Source saga was followed up by the lesser Dairy Goat Journal bunfight, while in the physical world students demonstrated in London and the Fitwatch blog providing advice to those students was shut down by police. In each case onlookers conjured up the spectre of “the mob” – a term whose primary definition – “A large disorderly crowd or throng” – belies the array of discourses that underpin it, partly related to its secondary definition – “The mass of common people; the populace”.

In other words, “mob” is a term used to frame a debate in emotional terms, to dismiss what may be a genuine outpouring of anger or resentment as invalid or illegitimate. For those reasons, I flinch when people talk about mobs instead of crowds.

Last week the video above was uploaded to YouTube. It shows a presentation describing the events leading up to a fatal flash mob. The story is fictional but the events it is constructed from are real*.

The prospect of such a series of events happening is terrifying and rightly thought-provoking: I would recommend it as a way of exploring journalism ethics in a networked age.

But the video is a syllogism – it makes an apparently logical (implied) argument that because these events have all happened and they are connected in technical terms, they could, eventually, all happen together.

The obvious flaw here is statistical: the probability of all those events leading to another is of a different order. We can all imagine all possible worlds.

It reminds me of Eric Morecambe’s joke, when pulled up on his piano playing, that he was playing all the right notes “but not necessarily in the right order”.

But the major flaw is logical. We are led from cause to effect, major to minor premise, but the ultimate event really has no connection with its beginnings. When large numbers of people gather in one place, sometimes it turns into a riot and people get killed. Technology has not changed that. Perhaps it makes it easier to do so – perhaps it makes it easier to disperse crowds when things go awry, or to call for assistance. Most likely all of the above. It’s the same technologically determinist mindset that blames Google Maps for terrorist attacks. As Douglas Adams put it in 1999:

“Newsreaders still feel it is worth a special and rather worrying mention if, for instance, a crime was planned by people ‘over the Internet.’ They don’t bother to mention when criminals use the telephone or the M4, or discuss their dastardly plans ‘over a cup of tea,’ though each of these was new and controversial in their day.”

In short: Don’t Panic.

*In the comments on YouTube Danosuke points out: “The one instance they cite as “already happened” was not a riot at all. There was no reported property damage or injuries. This is pointless fear mongering.”

Older posts are this way If this message doesn't go away, click anywhere on the page to continue loading posts.
Could not load more posts
Maybe Soup is currently being updated? I'll try again automatically in a few seconds...
Just a second, loading more posts...
You've reached the end.

Don't be the product, buy the product!

Schweinderl